It is possible that textual expertise will decide a controversy between Deputy Ramin Madinov and newspaper “Taszhargan”
15 january 2009
There was next legal proceeding by suit of the deputy of Majilis of Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan Ramin Madinov to the newspaper “Taszhargan”, its chief editor Bakhytgul Makimbay and journalist Almas Kusherbayev in Medeu District Court of Almaty on January 14, 2009.
The charges stemmed from article by Kusherbayev “Frustrate latifundist”, published in the newspaper “Taszhargan” on April 24, 2008. Ramin Madinov has asked to admit untruth information in the article “Frustrate latifundist”; make an apology before him as Deputy of Majilis of Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan and recover 300 millions tenge as damage from defendants in
It is possible that textual expertise will decide a controversy between Deputy Ramin Madinov and newspaper “Taszhargan”
There was next legal proceeding by suit of the deputy of Majilis of Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan Ramin Madinov to the newspaper “Taszhargan”, its chief editor Bakhytgul Makimbay and journalist Almas Kusherbayev in Medeu District Court of Almaty on January 14, 2009.
The charges stemmed from article by Kusherbayev “Frustrate latifundist”, published in the newspaper “Taszhargan” on April 24, 2008. Ramin Madinov has asked to admit untruth information in the article “Frustrate latifundist”; make an apology before him as Deputy of Majilis of Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan and recover 300 millions tenge as damage from defendants in his suit.
The court has returned suit to advocate of R. Madinov for refinement of demands at the previous legal proceeding. The plaintiff has elaborated that he did not agree to the whole information in the article “Frustrate latifundist”, which was connected with him.
The representative of defendant, lawyer of International Foundation for Protection of Freedom of Speech “Adil soz” Ganna Krasilnikova has made an application about necessity of appointment and implementation of commission textual expertise.
They will meet for discussion of questions on January 16, 2009. These questions are provided for experts. his suit.
The court has returned suit to advocate of R. Madinov for refinement of demands at the previous legal proceeding. The plaintiff has elaborated that he did not agree to the whole information in the article “Frustrate latifundist”, which was connected with him.
The representative of defendant, lawyer of International Foundation for Protection of Freedom of Speech “Adil soz” Ganna Krasilnikova has made an application about necessity of appointment and implementation of commission textual expertise.
They will meet for discussion of questions on January 16, 2009. These questions are provided for experts.
The charges stemmed from article by Kusherbayev “Frustrate latifundist”, published in the newspaper “Taszhargan” on April 24, 2008. Ramin Madinov has asked to admit untruth information in the article “Frustrate latifundist”; make an apology before him as Deputy of Majilis of Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan and recover 300 millions tenge as damage from defendants in
It is possible that textual expertise will decide a controversy between Deputy Ramin Madinov and newspaper “Taszhargan”
There was next legal proceeding by suit of the deputy of Majilis of Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan Ramin Madinov to the newspaper “Taszhargan”, its chief editor Bakhytgul Makimbay and journalist Almas Kusherbayev in Medeu District Court of Almaty on January 14, 2009.
The charges stemmed from article by Kusherbayev “Frustrate latifundist”, published in the newspaper “Taszhargan” on April 24, 2008. Ramin Madinov has asked to admit untruth information in the article “Frustrate latifundist”; make an apology before him as Deputy of Majilis of Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan and recover 300 millions tenge as damage from defendants in his suit.
The court has returned suit to advocate of R. Madinov for refinement of demands at the previous legal proceeding. The plaintiff has elaborated that he did not agree to the whole information in the article “Frustrate latifundist”, which was connected with him.
The representative of defendant, lawyer of International Foundation for Protection of Freedom of Speech “Adil soz” Ganna Krasilnikova has made an application about necessity of appointment and implementation of commission textual expertise.
They will meet for discussion of questions on January 16, 2009. These questions are provided for experts. his suit.
The court has returned suit to advocate of R. Madinov for refinement of demands at the previous legal proceeding. The plaintiff has elaborated that he did not agree to the whole information in the article “Frustrate latifundist”, which was connected with him.
The representative of defendant, lawyer of International Foundation for Protection of Freedom of Speech “Adil soz” Ganna Krasilnikova has made an application about necessity of appointment and implementation of commission textual expertise.
They will meet for discussion of questions on January 16, 2009. These questions are provided for experts.
